Re: scalablility problem - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: scalablility problem
Date
Msg-id 6434.1175358708@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: scalablility problem  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: scalablility problem  (Xiaoning Ding <dingxn@cse.ohio-state.edu>)
List pgsql-performance
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
>> I use RHEL 4. I can not understand how the scalability related with
>> shared memory?

> It isn't RHEL4 and shared memory. It is PostgreSQL and shared memory.
> Things have changed with PostgreSQL since 7.3 (7.3 is really god awful
> old) that allow it to more effectively access shared memory and thus
> provide better performance.

Some specifics:

* bufmgr algorithms redesigned to allow larger number of shared buffers
to be used effectively

* bufmgr redesigned to not have a single lock for management of all
shared buffers; likewise for lockmgr

* lots of marginal tweaks such as paying attention to cache line
alignment of "hot" shared data structures

I'm probably forgetting some things but I think the bufmgr and lockmgr
changes were the biggest improvements in this area.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Erik Jones
Date:
Subject: Re: Shared buffers, db transactions commited, and write IO on Solaris
Next
From: Xiaoning Ding
Date:
Subject: Re: scalablility problem