Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> When we did the 9.1 release notes, reviewers weren't credited, and I
> sort of assumed that policy would be the same this time around.
Yes. This seems to be a policy change that was made without notice or
discussion, and I personally don't find it to be a good idea. I think
the release notes should only credit the primary author(s) of a feature.
Face it, most people don't care about that, so we should not be
expending much space on it.
regards, tom lane
