On 2020/11/21 2:32, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The pg_stat_progress_cluster view can report incorrect
> heap_blks_scanned values when synchronize_seqscans is enabled, because
> it allows the sequential heap scan to not start at block 0. This can
> result in wraparounds in the heap_blks_scanned column when the table
> scan wraps around, and starting the next phase with heap_blks_scanned
> != heap_blks_total. This issue was introduced with the
> pg_stat_progress_cluster view.
Good catch! I agree that this is a bug.
>
> The attached patch fixes the issue by accounting for a non-0
> heapScan->rs_startblock and calculating the correct number with a
> non-0 heapScan->rs_startblock in mind.
Thanks for the patch! It basically looks good to me.
It's a bit waste of cycles to calculate and update the number of scanned
blocks every cycles. So I'm inclined to change the code as follows.
Thought?
+ BlockNumber prev_cblock = InvalidBlockNumber;
<snip>
+ if (prev_cblock != heapScan->rs_cblock)
+ {
+ pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_CLUSTER_HEAP_BLKS_SCANNED,
+ (heapScan->rs_cblock +
+ heapScan->rs_nblocks -
+ heapScan->rs_startblock
+ ) % heapScan->rs_nblocks + 1);
+ prev_cblock = heapScan->rs_cblock;
+ }
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
