Re: Libpq Asynchronous Command Processing - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alonso García , Bruno Elier
Subject Re: Libpq Asynchronous Command Processing
Date
Msg-id 63A652C37EE6E04BA5234D623423FF97BBA06489D8@MADARRMAILBOX03.indra.es
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Libpq Asynchronous Command Processing  (Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>)
Responses Re: Libpq Asynchronous Command Processing  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
>So PQexec works fine for you on both 7.4 and 8.3, producing a quick
>result no matter which server you run it against?

Yes. If I use PQexec, both 7.4 and 8.3 produce a quick result but I if I use asynchronous command processing 8.3
producea slow result whereas 7.4 works fine. 

>Consider using wireshark to examine the network traffic, and see if
>there's much activity during your long and slow PQconsumeInput /
>PQisBusy loop. The throughput analysis tool is handy for this.
I will be back with the results.
Bruno,

--
Craig Ringer

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Isabella Ghiurea
Date:
Subject: PG backup performance
Next
From: Viktor Pavlenko
Date:
Subject: Trouble with timestamp in PQprepare/PQexecPrepared