On 2021-01-20 08:50, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> Thanks for looking into this. I would like to keep both the LSN_FORMAT
> and LSN_FORMAT_ARGS but with a note that the first can not be used in
> elog() or in messages which require localization. We have many other
> places doing snprintf() and such stuff, which can use LSN_FORMAT. If we
> do so, the functions to output string representation will not be needed
> so they can be removed.
Then you'd end up with half the code doing this and half the code doing
that. That doesn't sound very attractive. It's not like "%X/%X" is
hard to type.
--
Peter Eisentraut
2ndQuadrant, an EDB company
https://www.2ndquadrant.com/
