Alex wrote:
> But when I check the pg_locks: session 1. I can see no tuple lock
> there, when I check the session 2, I can see a
> tuple(ExclusiveLock) is granted, but it is waiting for a
> transactionid.
>
> since every tuple has txn information, so it is not hard to
> implement it this way. but is there any benefits over the the
> straight way? with the current implementation, what is the point
> of tuple(ExclusiveLock) for session 2?
From what I can tell the reason is that pg_locks reports the
information from the shared memory locking table, and tuple locks
are *not* maintained there, but in the "xmax" of the row itself.
To see all tuple locks in pg_locks would require a sequential
scan of all tables which have certain locks on them, which is not
going to happen.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
