Re: Extended unit - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Extended unit
Date
Msg-id 6204.1106681500@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Extended unit  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Responses Re: Extended unit  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Re: Extended unit  (Pailloncy Jean-Gerard <jg@rilk.com>)
List pgsql-general
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
> We're talking here about a database with indexes to speed up
> intersection tests for arbitrary polygons, extensions to handle
> encryption, full text indexing and even builtin XML support.

... none of which require any extensions to the core type system.

AFAICS this could easily be implemented as a user-defined type, along
the lines of

    CREATE TYPE measurement AS (value double, units text);

and if you want to constrain a particular column to contain only one
value of units, use CHECK.

The argument that we should extend the type system for this would become
a lot more credible if there were a widely-used extension in existence
for it to prove that there's sufficient demand.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: John DeSoi
Date:
Subject: Re: EMBEDDED PostgreSQL
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Recursive queries