Re: More extension issues: ownership and search_path - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: More extension issues: ownership and search_path
Date
Msg-id 61C2387F-8CBC-42A0-9F6E-DC9F3F78FC5B@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: More extension issues: ownership and search_path  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Feb 7, 2011, at 9:20 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:

> Also, I didn't bite this bullet, but maybe we should provide core PLs as
> extension.  Then CREATE LANGUAGE would maybe get deprecated and only
> valid when used in an extension's script — or the next patch (UPGRADE)
> will take care of create a plpythonu extension then attaching the PL
> into it.

I anticipate dependencies becoming a big deal. I already have ideas for extensions that depend on citext, for example
(domainsfor time zone, email address, etc.). And yeah, some of those might depend on procedural languages. FWIW, I've
beenputting PL prereqs in META.json files on PGXN. pgTAP, for example, requires PL/pgSQL: 
 http://master.pgxn.org/dist/pgTAP/pgTAP-0.25.0.json

Best,

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: More extension issues: ownership and search_path
Next
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: More extension issues: ownership and search_path