On Fri, 2020-02-28 at 14:16 +0800, Adam Lee wrote:
> I noticed another difference, I was using palloc0(), which could be
> one of the
> reason, but not sure.
I changed the palloc0()'s in your code to plain palloc(), and it didn't
make any perceptible difference. Still slower than the version I posted
that keeps the flexible array.
Did you compare all 3? Master, with your patch, and with my patch? I'd
like to see if you're seeing the same thing that I am.
> Tested your hashagg-20200226.patch on my laptop(Apple clang version
> 11.0.0),
> the average time is 25.9s:
That sounds high -- my runs are about half that time. Is that with a
debug build or an optimized one?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
