Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code
Date
Msg-id 6161.1220390110@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code  ("Asko Oja" <ascoja@gmail.com>)
Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code  ("Marko Kreen" <markokr@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> "Marko Kreen" <markokr@gmail.com> writes:
>> Uh.  So you want force "proper" units in presentations at the price
>> of everyday admin operations?  Does not seem like a sensible tradeoff.

> It didn't to anyone else when Peter wrote the current version either, but as
> the person willing to actually do the work and write the code Peter got to
> make the decision. Nobody else stepped up to do the work to change it and we
> can't exactly force Peter to do work he doesn't agree with.

It's not that, in my mind: it's that Peter feels more strongly about it
than the rest of us.  This proposal has come up before and he's
successfully argued it down each time.  He does have a point about there
being some potential for confusion; and the arguments on the other side
are not much better than "I'm lazy".  Being lazy myself, I'd prefer a
case insensitive implementation; but I don't feel strongly enough about
it to want to override Peter's opinion.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: make dist does not include man.tar.gz and postgres.tar.gz
Next
From: "Asko Oja"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code