Re: Built-in connection pooling - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christophe Pettus
Subject Re: Built-in connection pooling
Date
Msg-id 6156C050-F61C-4FF8-A742-8E6E53C93085@thebuild.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Built-in connection pooling  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Built-in connection pooling
List pgsql-hackers
> On Apr 25, 2018, at 07:00, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote:
> The limitations headaches that I suffer with pgbouncer project (which
> I love and use often) are mainly administrative and performance
> related, not lack of session based server features.

For me, the most common issue I run into with pgbouncer (after general administrative overhead of having another moving
part)is that it works at cross purposes with database-based sharding, as well as useful role and permissions scheme.
Sinceeach server connection is specific to a database/role pair, you are left with some unappealing options to handle
thatin a pooling environment. 

The next most common problem are prepared statements breaking, which certainly qualifies as a session-level feature.
--
-- Christophe Pettus
   xof@thebuild.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stas Kelvich
Date:
Subject: Re: unused_oids script is broken with bsd sed
Next
From: Alexander Kuzmenkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Reopen logfile on SIGHUP