Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility?
Date
Msg-id 6149.1025292093@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>> The cvs docs say that we support the 'WITH CHECK OPTION' on views, but the
>> TODO says we don't...

> TODO updated.  Not sure when it was added but I see it in SGML docs.

A moment's examination of gram.y would have convinced you that the
docs are wrong ...
        regards, tom lane




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility?
Next
From: nconway@klamath.dyndns.org (Neil Conway)
Date:
Subject: Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility?