Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From nconway@klamath.dyndns.org (Neil Conway)
Subject Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility?
Date
Msg-id 20020628193521.GB5727@klamath.dyndns.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 02:57:27PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > The cvs docs say that we support the 'WITH CHECK OPTION' on views, but the
> > TODO says we don't...
> 
> TODO updated.  Not sure when it was added but I see it in SGML docs.

On a related note, the SQL99 feature list in the development docs says
that we support the SQL99 UNIQUE predicate. AFAIK we don't -- should
the docs be updated?

Cheers,

Neil

-- 
Neil Conway <neilconway@rogers.com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility?