Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility?
Date
Msg-id 200206281929.g5SJTbL25384@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> >> The cvs docs say that we support the 'WITH CHECK OPTION' on views, but the
> >> TODO says we don't...
> 
> > TODO updated.  Not sure when it was added but I see it in SGML docs.
> 
> A moment's examination of gram.y would have convinced you that the
> docs are wrong ...

Oh, OK.  In the future, the "A moment's examination" swipe isn't
required.  :-(  I suppose it makes you feel better.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: nconway@klamath.dyndns.org (Neil Conway)
Date:
Subject: Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility?
Next
From: nconway@klamath.dyndns.org (Neil Conway)
Date:
Subject: bug in new timestamp code