Re: Expand palloc/pg_malloc API - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Expand palloc/pg_malloc API
Date
Msg-id 6133fd6f-609a-68b1-1cae-056bbbb8baad@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Expand palloc/pg_malloc API  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Expand palloc/pg_malloc API
Re: Expand palloc/pg_malloc API
List pgsql-hackers
On 09.09.22 22:13, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> I have updated this patch set to rename the _obj() functions to
>> _object(), and I have dropped the _ptrtype() variants.
> 
>> I have also split the patch to put the new API and the example uses into
>> separate patches.
> 
> This patch set seems fine to me, so I've marked it Ready for Committer.

committed

> I think serious consideration should be given to back-patching the
> 0001 part (that is, addition of the macros).  Otherwise we'll have
> to remember not to use these macros in code intended for back-patch,
> and that'll be mighty annoying once we are used to them.

Yes, the 0001 patch is kept separate so that we can do that when we feel 
the time is right.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: bt22kawamotok
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Feature improvement for MERGE tab completion
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Assertion failure in WaitForWALToBecomeAvailable state machine