On 4. feb 2004, at 20:51, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Neil Conway wrote:
>> David Helgason <david@uti.is> writes:
>>> I needed these, so I went and implemented them myself.
>>
>> I didn't see any followup to this: do we want to include this in the
>> main tree, contrib/, or not at all?
> getbit sounds a lot like what substring() does. So perhaps setbit
> could
> actually be handled by replace()? That would be a more general
> solution (since it would handle more than one bit at a time).
I sort of agree, but it's currently documented like I implemented it
(afaics), so it's a simple thing to include.
I feel a bit bad for not having done a full patch with test-cases and
.bki modifications etc., but it seemed a pretty daunting task (for my
schedule at least).
Hope someone can use it though.
David Helgason,
Over the Edge Entertainments
