On 08/24/21 15:12, Robert Haas wrote:
> I find it hard to
> believe that we would seriously consider replacing every direct GUC
> reference in the backend with something that goes through an API.
Peter may have advocated for that kind of across-the-board adoption;
my leaning is more to add an API that /can/ be adopted, initially with
separately-linked extensions as the audience. Nothing would stop it being
used in core as well, but no reason to change any site where it did not
offer an advantage.
I generally tend to be an incrementalist.
Regards,
-Chap
