Re: VACUUM FULL vs CLUSTER - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Chris Browne
Subject Re: VACUUM FULL vs CLUSTER
Date
Msg-id 60ll1noetr.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to unsubscribe  (Nelba Sánchez Rojas <nnsanche@puc.cl>)
List pgsql-performance
svb@ucs.co.za (Stef) writes:
> Bruno Wolff III mentioned :
> => If you have a proper FSM setting you shouldn't need to do vacuum fulls
> => (unless you have an older version of postgres where index bloat might
> => be an issue).
>
> What version of postgres was the last version that had
> the index bloat problem?

I believe that was fixed in 7.3; it was certainly resolved by 7.4...
--
(format nil "~S@~S" "cbbrowne" "cbbrowne.com")
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/spiritual.html
MICROS~1 has  brought the  microcomputer OS to  the point where  it is
more bloated than even OSes from what was previously larger classes of
machines   altogether.   This  is   perhaps  Bill's   single  greatest
accomplishment.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Mark Lewis
Date:
Subject: Re: Releasing memory during External sorting?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Releasing memory during External sorting?