chris@travelamericas.com (Chris Travers) writes:
>>At least on Windows, the GUID is derived in part from the computers
>>primary MAC address. No, it's not a guarantee, but it's pretty unlikely
>>:-)
> The danger is not that the MAC address will be duplicated, but that
> other factors will lead to an MD5 collision.
What factors?
The 'random' portion comes _in addition to_ location information and a
timestamp, so that for there to be a collision, you need to be
generating thousands of GUIDs *per millisecond* on a given host.
> Unless you can show me that there is a 1:1 correspondence of all
> possible unique factors going into the GUID generation and the output,
> then I will say it is still no guarantee.
Read the RFC (4122). It shows how it works.
> So you could use the Mac address of the machine, I guess, if you
> wanted to....
That is one option; section 4.3 of the RFC suggests an alternative
that is also likely to work.
--
(format nil "~S@~S" "cbbrowne" "acm.org")
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/sap.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #78. "I will not tell my Legions of Terror
"And he must be taken alive!" The command will be: ``And try to take
him alive if it is reasonably practical.''"
<http://www.eviloverlord.com/>
