Re: allow specifying direct role membership in pg_hba.conf - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Chapman Flack
Subject Re: allow specifying direct role membership in pg_hba.conf
Date
Msg-id 60A2D293.6040907@anastigmatix.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: allow specifying direct role membership in pg_hba.conf  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: allow specifying direct role membership in pg_hba.conf
List pgsql-hackers
On 05/17/21 16:15, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> The row is selected by the combination of username/database/ipaddress.
> But you have to pick the minimum TLS version before the client has
> sent that... Basically we have to make the choice long before we've
> even started looking at pg_hba.

Use the peer IP address to pre-filter the available pg_hba entries to
those pertaining to that address ... choose a min protocol version that's
the min specified among those ... then get the username and database name
(by which point a protocol has been negotiated), then further filter the
list down to those pertaining to that user and database and allowing that
protocol version?

Yes, clunky, but avoids a more ambitious redesign of pg_hba.

I'm not sure a more ambitious redesign would be a bad thing in principle;
the pg_hba.conf syntax seems rather clunky and limiting to begin with,
and I keep wondering why it isn't in shared tables or something. But
I suppose a lot of external admin tools have some knowledge of it?

Regards,
-Chap



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: allow specifying direct role membership in pg_hba.conf
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft