Re: Clustered tables improves perfs ? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Chris Browne
Subject Re: Clustered tables improves perfs ?
Date
Msg-id 608x7azkkq.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Clustered tables improves perfs ?  (Patrice Castet <pcastet@agematis.com>)
List pgsql-performance
pcastet@agematis.com (Patrice Castet) writes:
> I wonder if clustering a table improves perfs somehow ?
> Any example/ideas about that ?
> ref : http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/sql-cluster.html

Sometimes.

1.  It compacts the table, which may be of value, particularly if the
table is not seeing heavy UPDATE/DELETE traffic.  VACUUM and VACUUM
FULL do somewhat similar things; if you are using VACUUM frequently
enough, this is not likely to have a material effect.

2.  It transforms the contents of the table into some specified order,
which will improve efficiency for any queries that use that specific
ordering.
--
output = reverse("moc.enworbbc" "@" "enworbbc")
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/emacs.html
"You can swear at the keyboard  and it won't be offended. It was going
to treat you badly anyway" -- Arthur Norman

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Brad Nicholson
Date:
Subject: Re: Long Running Commits - Not Checkpoints
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Long Running Commits - Not Checkpoints