On 1/4/25 11:07, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 4, 2025 at 5:48 AM David Steele <david@pgbackrest.org> wrote:
>> We had one issue reported [1] involving Alpine Linux and CIFS and
>
> Not directly relevant for pgbackrest probably, but I noticed that
> Alpine comes up in a few reports of failing rm -r on CIFS. I think it
> might be because BSD and GNU rm use fts to buffer pathnames in user
> space (narrow window), while Alpine uses busybox rm which has a
> classic readdir()/unlink() loop:
Yeah, this doesn't affect pgBackRest because we have our own rmtree that
uses snapshots (for the last few years, at least).
> As for CIFS, there are lots of reports of this sort of thing from
> Linux CIFS clients.
There may be users running Postgres on CIFS but my guess is that is rare
-- at least I have never seen anyone doing it.
I'm more concerned about the report we saw on SUSE/NFS [1]. If that
report is accurate it indicates this may not be something we can just
document and move on from -- unless we are willing to entirely drop
support for NFS.
Regards,
-David
[1] https://github.com/pgbackrest/pgbackrest/issues/1423