Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required? - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?
Date
Msg-id 603c8f071003051256o6b9f9eban6d61afa6449aa6d@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> By splitting out the doc building into a separate target, we will have
> less users installing the documentation.

I don't see why.  And even if it's true, it just means some people
were installing the docs "by accident" before even though they didn't
really want them.

...Robert

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #5348: Postgres crashes with index on xpath_string