On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> > Adding SQL to indicate whether it should be re-planned or not is completely
>> > unappealing. If I could change the code, today, I'd just turn off or choose
>> > not to use PREPARE/EXECUTE. Today, PREPARE/EXECUTE seems like it should
>> > always be considered slower unless one can prove it is actually faster in a
>> > specific case, which is the exact opposite of what people expect.
>>
>> I don't really understand most of what you're saying here, but there's
>> definitely some truth to your last sentence. This has easily got to
>> be one of the top ten questions on -performance.
>
> It seems it is the problem everyone knows about but no one fixes. :-(
I'd work on it, but Tom doesn't like my proposed fix. *shrug*
...Robert
