On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I think this is basically a planner problem and should be fixed in the
> planner, not by expecting users to make significant changes in
> application logic in order to create an indirect effect.
I would agree if I thought that were possible, but I'm skeptical about
your proposed solution.
...Robert
