On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey! I don't think were quite to that nasty B word yet :) I would
> argue that treating plperl and plperlu as the same language just
> because it shares the same code is a mistake. But I hate the idea of
> two custom_variable_classes for plperl(u) as well. Which is why I
> quickly switched to plperl.on_plperl(u)_init. Any thoughts on those?
> Again maybe people think the original names are fine... *shrug*.
I like plperl.on_plperl(u)_init better than plperl.on_(un)trusted_init.
...Robert
