On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Takahiro Itagaki
<itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> * Do we need better names for string_agg1_transfn and string_agg2_transfn?
> They are almost "internal names", but we could have more
> like string_agg_with_sep_transfn.
Surely the names of the transition and final functions should match
the name of the aggregate. But if there's a proposal on the table to
call this string_app_with_sep() instead of just string_agg(), +1 from
me.
...Robert
