2010/1/28 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Takahiro Itagaki
> <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> * Do we need better names for string_agg1_transfn and string_agg2_transfn?
>> They are almost "internal names", but we could have more
>> like string_agg_with_sep_transfn.
>
> Surely the names of the transition and final functions should match
> the name of the aggregate. But if there's a proposal on the table to
> call this string_app_with_sep() instead of just string_agg(), +1 from
> me.
no, >>>string_app_with_sep<<< is too long for common using.
Pavel
>
> ...Robert
>
