Re: New server to improve performance on our large and busy DB - advice? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: New server to improve performance on our large and busy DB - advice?
Date
Msg-id 603c8f071001201803r3d0a1b12pd20fbc0ee71b03d5@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New server to improve performance on our large and busy DB - advice?  ("Carlo Stonebanks" <stonec.register@sympatico.ca>)
List pgsql-performance
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Carlo Stonebanks
<stonec.register@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>> Yes!  You can run vacuum verbose against the regular old postgres
>> database (or just create one for testing with nothing in it) and
>> you'll still get the fsm usage numbers from that!  So, no need to run
>> it against the big db.  However, if regular vacuum verbose couldn't
>> finish in a week, then you've likely got vacuum and autovacuum set to
>> be too timid in their operation, and may be getting pretty bloated as
>> we speak.  Once the fsm gets too blown out of the water, it's quicker
>> to dump and reload the whole DB than to try and fix it.
>
> My client reports this is what they actualyl do on a monthly basis.

Something is deeply wrong with your client's vacuuming policies.

...Robert

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Carlo Stonebanks"
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: New server to improve performance on our large and busy DB - advice? (v2)
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: ext4 finally doing the right thing