On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> I think that USING is just about as content-free as WITH in this
>>> particular example --- it doesn't give you any hint about what the
>>> purpose of the operator is.
>
>> USING might be just as content-free as WITH, but USING OPERATOR seems
>> clearly better, at least IMO.
>
> It's not enough better to justify the conflict with USING opclass, IMO.
>
> An idea that just struck me is CHECK WITH, ie
>
> EXCLUSION (expr CHECK WITH operator)
I don't like that as well as USING OPERATOR, but I like it far better
than any of the single-word choices, so maybe it's a reasonable
compromise.
...Robert
