On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
>> Tom Lane escribió:
>>> Um, sorry, no reason to do which?
>
>> No reason not to leave prototypes alone in the AWK code. Isn't the
>> style emitted by indent good enough already? The comment that ctags
>> needs it is probably outdated (I know my ctags, the Exuberant one,
>> doesn't).
>
> Personally I quite like the fact that the function definition is the
> only place where the function name appears left-justified. Modern ctags
> might or might not care, but there are all sorts of code search tools
> out there and we should not presume which ones developers are using.
> I vote against changing it.
+1000. I use git grep '^function_name' constantly.
...Robert
