On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> There is definitely not enough evidence here to justify breaking
> existing applications, which is what introducing => would do.
> When and if there's a ratified standard using =>, it'll be time
> to break stuff. In the meantime we can do something with AS and
> be reasonably certain we haven't painted ourselves into a corner.
I wasn't proposing introducing => ; I thought we might want to hold
off on doing anything at all. But I may be the only one, so never
mind.
...Robert
