Re: extension facility (was: revised hstore patch) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: extension facility (was: revised hstore patch)
Date
Msg-id 603c8f070907231125j305257f6s53287e4024180935@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: extension facility (was: revised hstore patch)  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:05 AM, David E. Wheeler<david@kineticode.com> wrote:
> On Jul 23, 2009, at 4:08, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes... but "if" and "just" can paper over a good deal of complexity, and
>> it's not clear to me that there's any compensating advantage.
>
> It seems reasonable not to worry about this issue in the first rev, or at
> least not to let it stop development of other features, so that it gas time
> to gel via discussion over time.

Yes, I still think the most fundamental issue here is getting to the
point where pg_dump dumps the right thing.  The central aspect of that
is a system for keeping track of which objects are part of an
extension using pg_depend.

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Determining client_encoding from client locale
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Aggregate-function space leakage