Re: Predicate migration on complex self joins - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Predicate migration on complex self joins
Date
Msg-id 603c8f070907131133q327fff51p92e17600a80e48a@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Predicate migration on complex self joins  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
>> In some cases, we have SQL being submitted that has superfluous
>> self-joins. An example would be
>
>> select count(*)
>> from foo1 a, foo1 b
>> where a.c1 = b.c1 /* PK join */
>> and a.c2 = 5
>> and b.c2 = 10;
>
>> You may well ask who would be stupid enough to write SQL like that. The
>> answer is of course that it is automatically generated by an ORM.
>
> Seems like the right answer is "fix the damn ORM".  It's hard to believe
> this sort of case comes up often enough to justify the cycles that would
> be expended (on *every* join query) to try to recognize it.

I think it's more common than you might think.  It's been requested on
-performance within recent memory, and I've had cases where I needed
to deal with it as well.  You can't write:

DELETE FROM table AS alias LEFT JOIN othertable ...

so you end up writing:

DELETE FROM table AS alias USING sametable LEFT JOIN othertable ...

or sometimes:

DELETE FROM table AS alias USING viewthatconstainstable ...

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Predicate migration on complex self joins
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: [RFC] obtaining the function call stack