Re: machine-readable explain output - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: machine-readable explain output
Date
Msg-id 603c8f070906160804u196fff64h98d0e3f3b92f31b4@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: machine-readable explain output  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
>
> Robert Haas wrote:
>>>
>>> If there is a relationship between the items then that needs to be
>>> expressed
>>> in the XML structure, either by use of child nodes or attributes. Relying
>>> on
>>> the sequence of nodes, if that's what you're doing, is not a good idea,
>>> and
>>>
>>
>> I'm not doing that.  Period, full stop.  The discussion was only about
>> attributes vs. child nodes.
>>
>>
>
> OK, I misread something you wrote, which prompted me to say that. Rereading
> it I realise my error. My apologies.

No problem, no apologies needed.  I guess we do emit nodes like append
plans in the same order that they'd be emitted in text mode.  Right
now we don't emit any additional information beyond putting them in
the same order, but I suppose that could be changed if needs be.

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: machine-readable explain output
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Synch Rep: communication between backends and walsender