Re: add_path optimization - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: add_path optimization
Date
Msg-id 603c8f070902020650p3e1861c4of9c0aefeb855f088@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: add_path optimization  (Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj@pointblue.com.pl>)
Responses Re: add_path optimization
List pgsql-hackers
> well, true - but also, statically allocated table, without any predefined
> size (with #DEFINE) , and no boundary check - is bad as well.
> I suppose , this code is easy enough to let it be with your changes, but I
> would still call it not pretty.

Well, it might merit a comment.

> Actually - if you did profile postgresql with bunch of queries, I wouldn't
> mind to see results of it - I don't know whether it makes sense to send that
> to the list (I would think it does), but if it is too big, or something -
> you could send it to me in private.

What I'd really like to do is develop some tests based on a publicly
available dataset.  Any suggestions?

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Chernow
Date:
Subject: Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: why declare arg as a array in FunctionCallInfoData structure