Re: Big index sizes - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Big index sizes
Date
Msg-id 603c8f070812300643n3bcc0454j2022d4efaa6122d5@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Big index sizes  (Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 4:05 AM, Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> wrote:
> We have serveral table where the index size is much bigger than the table
> size.

You'll usually get index bloat in roughly the same measure that you
get table bloat.  If you always (auto)vacuum regularly, then the
amount of bloat in your indexes probably reflects the amount of bloat
that your tables typically accumulate between vacuums, so reindexing
won't help much.  The indexes will just re-bloat back to about the
same point over the next vacuum cycle or two.

On the other hand, if your table has shrunk considerably, or if you've
just removed a lot of bloat by vacuuming, REINDEX is often warranted.

It would be nice if the system could automatically notice and correct
situations that currently require VACUUM FULL or REINDEX, but it
doesn't.

...Robert

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Anton Bogdanovitch
Date:
Subject: perform 1 check vs exception when unique_violation
Next
From: "Robert Haas"
Date:
Subject: Re: perform 1 check vs exception when unique_violation