Re: Common Table Expressions applied; some issues remain - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Common Table Expressions applied; some issues remain
Date
Msg-id 603c8f070810061304n55bb5ca7i9dbf80cfa58de998@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Common Table Expressions applied; some issues remain  (Decibel! <decibel@decibel.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Agreed. It's already horrible that we suggest people use OFFSET 0, only
> because we don't want to define formal optimizer hints (and that's *exactly*
> what OFFSET 0 is).

Yes, especially since TFM says:

"OFFSET 0 is the same as omitting the OFFSET clause."

Unless I'm looking at the wrong part of the manual?

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Weird behaviour with ALTER TABLE ... SET TABLESPACE ... statement
Next
From: Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
Date:
Subject: query path, and rules