Hi
Why not take a look at Rekall - http://www.totalrekall.co.uk. Rekall is a
RAD tool for building database applications. It is similar to both
FileMaker and MS Access but costs a faction of the price. Rekall supports
PostreSQL natively as well as several other database engines. An ODBC
interface driver is available if needed. Rekall runs on Windows, Linux and
Mac X OS ( this a first beta release ). There is also available a Run Time
version of Rekall, which allows you to distribute your application, without
the need for your clients the buy a full developer edition. The Run Time
version prevents people from making alterations to your application. A
version of the Rekall Run Time system, which will include on-the-fly
encryption/decryption of your application, will be available soon
At 00:57 13/05/2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>>with Filemaker, a database is a table. Each file only has one table and
>>>all layouts/reports/forms and scripts are in the same file. This setup
>>>has pros and cons that are irrelevant now.
>>
>>I'm not familiar with FileMaker, but my understanding is that it can
>>communicate with other databases via ODBC. Would it not be possible to
>>keep your investment (at least for a while) in the front end forms and
>>convert to PostgreSQL as the data store?
>
>I don't think FileMaker is quite as flexible as say Access in that way.
>However they may want to look in to Paradox?
>
>Sincerely,
>
>Joshua D. Drake
>
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
>
---
Regards
John Dean,
co-author of Rekall,
the only alternative
to MS Access
