Re: Information Schema and constraint names not - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Philip Warner
Subject Re: Information Schema and constraint names not
Date
Msg-id 6.0.0.22.0.20031107105014.04689af8@203.8.195.10
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Information Schema and constraint names not unique  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Information Schema and constraint names not
Re: Information Schema and constraint names not
List pgsql-hackers
At 03:37 AM 7/11/2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>It would
>already help a lot if we just added the table name, or something that was
>until a short time before the action believed to be the table name, or
>even only the table OID, before (or after) the $1.

Can we allow/bypass the pg_* restriction, and call it pg_<table-oid>_<n>, 
and for pedants like me, add a DB setting that says 'enforce unique 
constraints' ala the spec to avoid manually created constraints being 
non-unique?

Alternatively, I would be happy *not* to enforce constraint name uniqueness 
(and break the spec) so long as we also break the spec and add table OID 
(or something else) to the information schema (table name would be OK so 
long as renaming the table won't break anything).







----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498)          |          /(@)   ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81         |                 _________  \
Fax: (+61) 03 5330 3172          |                 ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|                                 |    --________--
PGP key available upon request,  |  /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371   |/ 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: stats collector causes shared-memory-block leakage
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Information Schema and constraint names not