On 2025/04/26 3:03, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> I agree with these changes.
>
> I think that while the changes for (2) should be for v19, the changes
> for (1) might be treated as a bug fix?
Agreed. I've split the patch into two parts:
0001 is for (1) and is a bug fix that should be back-patched to v16,
where parallel apply workers were introduced. Since it didn't apply
cleanly to v16, I also created a separate patch specifically for v16.
0002 is for (2) and is intended for v19.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
