Michael Lewis schrieb am 08.01.2021 um 17:47:
> > For me, it seems too easily error prone such that a single typo in
> > the IN clause may result in an entire partition being removed that
> > wasn't supposed to be targeted.
>
> I don't see how this is more dangerous then:
>
> delete from base_table
> where partition_key in (...);
>
> which would serve the same purpose, albeit less efficient.
>
>
> Delete has a rollback option, and you can dry-run to see impacted rows effectively. Truncate does not.
TRUNCATE can be rolled back as well.
