On 8/9/24 8:24 PM, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-08-09 at 13:41 +0200, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
>> I am leaning towards that we should write our own pure ascii
>> functions
>> for this.
>
> That makes sense for a lot of call sites, but it could cause breakage
> if we aren't careful.
>
>> Since we do not support any non-ascii compatible encodings
>> anyway I do not see the point in having locale support in most of
>> these
>> call-sites.
>
> An ascii-compatible encoding just means that the code points in the
> ascii range are represented as ascii. I'm not clear on whether code
> points in the ascii range can return different results for things like
> isspace(), but it sounds plausible -- toupper() can return different
> results for 'i' in tr_TR.
>
> Also, what about the values outside 128-255, which are still valid
> input to isspace()?
My idea was that in a lot of those cases we only try to parse e.g. 0-9
as digits and always only . as the decimal separator so we should make
just make that obvious by either using locale C or writing our own ascii
only functions. These strings are meant to be read by machines, not
humans, primarily.
Andreas
