> this point me and Jesper inclined to go with the second option. But maybe
> I'm missing something, are there any other suggestions?
Unfortunately I figured this would need a more invasive fix. I tend to agree that it'd be better to not skip in
situationslike this. I think it'd make most sense to make any plan for these 'prepare/fetch' queries would not use
skip,but rather a materialize node, right?
-Floris
