Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andreas Karlsson
Subject Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Date
Msg-id 5bad579d-7a99-74de-2311-b4f049da8b40@proxel.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 10/03/2018 05:57 PM, David Fetter wrote:
> Is there any meaningful distinction between "inlining," by which I
> mean converting to a subquery, and predicate pushdown, which
> would happen at least for a first cut, at the rewrite stage?

Sorry, but I do not think I understand your question. The ability to 
push down predicates is just one of the potential benefits from inlining.

Andreas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations
Next
From: Phil Florent
Date:
Subject: RE: [Proposal] Add accumulated statistics for wait event