Re: SQL/JSON features for v15 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jonathan S. Katz
Subject Re: SQL/JSON features for v15
Date
Msg-id 5b00e2f9-1662-2a10-125f-8e4da04ce64f@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL/JSON features for v15  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: SQL/JSON features for v15
List pgsql-hackers
On 8/29/22 8:56 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 5:11 AM Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:

> I am not sure if it's OK to eval_const_expressions() on a Query
> sub-expression during parse-analysis.  IIUC, it is only correct to
> apply it to after the rewriting phase.
> 
>>     Maybe it would be better to simply remove DEFAULT ON EMPTY.
> 
> So +1 to this for now.

+1, if this simplifies the patch and makes it acceptable for v15

>> It is possible to easily split this patch into several subpatches,
>> I will do it if needed.
> 
> That would be nice indeed.

With RMT hat on, the RMT has its weekly meetings on Tuesdays. Based on 
the timing of the Beta 4 commit freeze[1] and how both 
including/reverting are nontrivial operations (e.g. we should ensure 
we're confident in both and that they pass through the buildfarm), we 
are going to have to make a decision on how to proceed at the next meeting.

Can folks please chime in on what they think of the current patchset and 
if this is acceptable for v15?

Thanks,

Jonathan

[1] 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/9d251aec-cea2-bc1a-5ed8-46ef0bcf6c69@postgresql.org

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: torikoshia
Date:
Subject: Re: POC PATCH: copy from ... exceptions to: (was Re: VLDB Features)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing the chunk header sizes on all memory context types