Re: Error-safe user functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Error-safe user functions
Date
Msg-id 5aaf7c66-9df9-21a9-1ff4-02c7848def52@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Error-safe user functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Error-safe user functions
Re: Error-safe user functions
Re: Error-safe user functions
List pgsql-hackers
On 2022-12-09 Fr 10:16, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> On 2022-12-08 Th 21:59, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Yeah, I was planning to take a look at that before walking away from
>>> this stuff.  (I'm sure not volunteering to convert ALL the input
>>> functions, but I'll do the datetime code.)
>> Awesome. Perhaps if there are no more comments you can commit what you
>> currently have so people can start work on other input functions.
> Pushed.  


Great!


> As I said, I'll take a look at the datetime area.  Do we
> have any volunteers for other input functions?
>
>             


I am currently looking at the json types. I think that will be enough to
let us rework the sql/json patches as discussed a couple of months ago.


cheers


andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Error-safe user functions
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Raising the SCRAM iteration count