Re: Could postgres12 support millions of sequences? (like 10 million) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Rob Sargent
Subject Re: Could postgres12 support millions of sequences? (like 10 million)
Date
Msg-id 5ECC9E60-C4BF-47F2-AB6D-3782B05B438C@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Could postgres12 support millions of sequences? (like 10 million)  (pabloa98 <pabloa98@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Could postgres12 support millions of sequences? (like 10 million)
List pgsql-general


On Mar 21, 2020, at 12:18 PM, pabloa98 <pabloa98@gmail.com> wrote:



Why?  "Print" and "screen" forms have all sorts of practical restrictions
like this.

Legacy I guess. These are all digital stuff. But the final result is an identifier that people can read and realize what they are talking about.


I think  the “why” was directed at my comment. 
I’m suspicious of the practicality. 

To me the description of the ID smacks of database-in-the-name folly. I recognize that OP is likely unable to take another path. I’ll not push this any further. 

Pablo

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: pabloa98
Date:
Subject: Re: Could postgres12 support millions of sequences? (like 10 million)
Next
From: "Peter J. Holzer"
Date:
Subject: Re: Could postgres12 support millions of sequences? (like 10 million)