Re: sig 6 on postgres server - Mailing list pgsql-novice

From Lee, Mija
Subject Re: sig 6 on postgres server
Date
Msg-id 5D1219ADBE9E6C4CA6F0F89C811C102F029B12DD@ISIS.fhcrc.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: sig 6 on postgres server  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-novice
Thanks for the response, Tom. We do have hard mounts, and unfortunately,
we are dependent on nfs.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 6:47 PM
To: Lee, Mija
Cc: pgsql-novice@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] sig 6 on postgres server

"Lee, Mija" <mija@scharp.org> writes:
> Recently I had a postgres instance shut down & restart, and I'm trying
> to understand why. I'm running 8.3.5 on solaris 10, with the data
> directory on a netapp. The postgres log shows an error associated with
> some of the critical application tables not existing, then it was
unable
> to write to the log, then a sigabrt.

> cpas 2009-03-02 14:58:34 PSTPANIC:  could not write to log file 93,
> segment 240 at offset 9560064, length 8192: Interrupted system call

EINTR?  Hmm, I wonder if you have the data directory on a "soft" NFS
mount?  We tend not to trust NFS too much at all around here, but if
you have to use it, hard-mount is more reliable than soft.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-novice by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: sig 6 on postgres server
Next
From: Semyon Chaichenets
Date:
Subject: plpgsql: help with RECORD type