Re: [WIP] UNNEST(REFCURSOR): allowing SELECT to consume data from a REFCURSOR - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dent John
Subject Re: [WIP] UNNEST(REFCURSOR): allowing SELECT to consume data from a REFCURSOR
Date
Msg-id 5C9D128B-7347-4F5B-8707-754E25200DC1@QQdd.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [WIP] UNNEST(REFCURSOR): allowing SELECT to consume data from a REFCURSOR  (Massimo Fidanza <malix0@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [WIP] UNNEST(REFCURSOR): allowing SELECT to consume data from a REFCURSOR  (Massimo Fidanza <malix0@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Massimo,

Thanks for the interest, and my apologies for the late reply.

I’m not particularly abandoning it, but I don’t have particular reason to make further changes at the moment. Far as I’m concerned it works, and the main question is whether it is acceptable and useful.

I’d be happy if you have feedback that evolves it or might push it up the queue for commitfest review.

d.

On 18 Jan 2021, at 23:09, Massimo Fidanza <malix0@gmail.com> wrote:

This is an interesting feature, but it seems that the author has abandoned development, what happens now? Will this be postponed from commitfest to commitfest and never be taken over by anyone?

Massimo.

Il giorno ven 6 mar 2020 alle ore 22:36 Dent John <denty@qqdd.eu> ha scritto:
> On 22 Feb 2020, at 10:38, Dent John <denty@QQdd.eu> wrote:
>
>> On 18 Feb 2020, at 03:03, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> From the trivialities department, I see a bunch of warnings about
>> local declaration placement (we're still using C90 rules for those by
>> project policy):
>>
>> […]
>
> […]

My bad. I missed on declaration.

Another patch attached.

d.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays
Next
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?